MasterSearch

AddThis

Showing posts with label Oracle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oracle. Show all posts

July 31, 2011

Understanding Chinese Energy - Infographic

The information is a bit outdated, 2007, but still interesting nevertheless...

Understanding Chinese Energy 

Infographic


As the world looks to a more energy efficient future, it is economic and population powerhouses such as China that will come under the most intense scrutiny. By carefully examining the Chinese energy policy (in fields such as wind and solar), and conjoining this with surveys on popular opinion, WellHome have managed to compile this interesting infographic.
However, the source of energy use are left largely unexplored yet a brilliant piece on Chinese energy gives us a clearer indication of the forces at play (the PDF is worthy of downloading): 

What’s driving demand: An explanation of the internal dynamics fueling China’s energy needs. Our key point: It’s not air conditioners and automobiles that are driving China’s current energy demand but rather heavy industry, and the mix of what China makes for itself and what it buys abroad. Consumption-led demand is China’s future energy challenge. [Source: China Energy: A Guide for the Perplexed (PDF)]


Share |
_______________________________________
Check it out on The MasterTech Blog

October 01, 2010

Former SAP Chief to Lead Hewlett-Packard

Former SAP Chief to Lead Hewlett-Packard

September 30, 2010
SAN FRANCISCO — Hewlett-Packard’s board chose equal parts pragmatism, aggressiveness and surprise with its hiring of Léo Apotheker as the company’s new chief executive.
H.P. revealed Mr. Apotheker’s appointment on Thursday, filling a void left when Mark V. Hurd was ousted in August. Mr. Apotheker, a German, spent 20 years at the business software maker SAP, including a recent, abbreviated stint as its chief executive. His experience meshes with H.P.’s current strategy of dominating the business computing market and could help revitalize the company’s lackluster software business.
“It is a huge privilege to be here today,” Mr. Apotheker said in an interview. “H.P. is the iconic company of this industry, and it is a dream job that anyone would want to have.”
Investors hoped that H.P. would tap someone capable of maintaining the company’s efficient structure while also adding a fresh, innovative spark that some found lacking under Mr. Hurd. In particular, investors had talked about finding an executive who could run the business computing side while also revitalizing consumer product initiatives like H.P.’s smartphone strategy, following its acquisition of Palm.
There was rampant speculation about who would fill the role, and Mr. Apotheker’s name did not appear on most short lists.
Wall Street gave the news a lukewarm reception, sending H.P.’s shares down about 3 percent to $40.82 in after-hours trading.
H.P. ended regular trading down 1 percent at $42.07. The stock has yet to recover from a sharp slide following Mr. Hurd’s exit, and the company has lost $12.6 billion in market value since then.
Ray Lane, a managing partner at the venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers and a former Oracle executive, was named to H.P.’s board and will serve as nonexecutive chairman. Taken together, the recruitment of Mr. Apotheker and Mr. Lane would seem to signal that H.P. planned a more forceful march into the business software market, where it would butt up against Oracle, I.B.M., Microsoft and SAP.
“I think you have to take it that way,” said China Martens, a software analyst for the 451 Group. “To bring in people with software stamped all over them is very intriguing.”
While it is the largest seller of printers, PCs and computer servers, H.P. has struggled to expand its software business at comparable rates. It bought a number of companies that make software for helping manage data centers, but it is less involved in the traditional business software markets with products that track data, inventory, employees and sales leads.
Any shift toward the business software realm would lead it to tread on Oracle’s toes, and tensions between the two companies already run high.
In August, Lawrence J. Ellison, Oracle’s chief executive, publicly ridiculed H.P.’s board for the way it had handled Mr. Hurd’s exit. H.P.’s board concluded that Mr. Hurd had violated company policies in the way he conducted a personal relationship with a marketing contractor. In particular, the board said that Mr. Hurd had left the contractor’s name off of expense reports when he should have included it.
In September, Oracle hired Mr. Hurd as a co-president, and H.P. responded with a lawsuit. The parties have since resolved their legal dispute, but they remain fierce competitors. Oracle has started selling computer servers, encroaching on H.P.’s turf, and H.P. has now tapped a couple of executives with deep knowledge of Oracle’s practices.
Mr. Apotheker moved through the ranks of SAP, including stints as the head of sales, co-chief executive and chief executive. He resigned as chief executive in February, just seven months after earning the job outright.
During his tenure as chief, SAP suffered through a large round of layoffs, major product delays and a customer revolt against the company’s decision to raise software support prices.
“I think it would be fair to say he left SAP under a cloud, but it would also be fair to say it wasn’t all his fault,” Ms. Martens said, adding that Mr. Apotheker can come off as both polished and abrasive.
For his part, Mr. Apotheker said: “My claim to fame is that I made SAP into the largest business software company on the planet.”
Mr. Apotheker’s hiring marks the third time in a row that H.P. has passed over internal executives when it came to filling a vacant chief executive spot.
Brendan Barnicle, an analyst at Pacific Crest Securities, said Mr. Apotheker was hardly considered a front runner for the job, particularly given his lack of expertise in hardware.
“It’s an interesting choice, and it’s not something I would have expected,” Mr. Barnicle said.
He added that the culture at H.P., where the traditional emphasis has been on the customer, was very different from at SAP, which prizes its engineering culture.
Ross S. MacMillan, an analyst with Jefferies & Company, said Mr. Apotheker’s lack of hardware experience was not necessarily a shortcoming. He pointed to Mr. Apotheker’s sales background and said he could take advantage of his existing relationships with big customers.
“Those individual decision makers are going to be the same for SAP as H.P.,” Mr. MacMillan said. “He may not be the expert on hardware, but he has the buyer relationships.”
Mr. MacMillan also pointed to Mr. Apotheker’s German background as a potential plus for H.P. when it came to adding business in Europe. Of particular note, he said, was that Mr. Apotheker spoke six languages.
As for H.P.’s shares falling on news of Mr. Apotheker’s hiring, Mr. MacMillan pointed to the surprise factor.
“This wasn’t deemed to be a candidate that was on people’s minds,” he said.
Verne G. Kopytoff contributed reporting.

Share |
_______________________________________
Check it out on The MasterTech Blog

August 16, 2010

What Goes Around Comes Around to Google (AAPL, GOOG, MSFT, ORCL)

What Goes Around Comes Around to Google

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2010/08/13/what-goes-around-comes-around-to-google.aspx

Anders Bylund

August 13, 2010


Way back in 2007, when Sun Microsystems was still a stand-alone business and Android a mere glimmer in Google's (Nasdaq: GOOG) eye, Sun had a problem with the way Android built on the Java software platform.

The problem was fragmentation: Android doesn't run bog-standard Java code, but instead translates programs written for that platform into its own format, which is then executed by the Dalvik virtual machine that is the cold, robotic heart of any Android gadget. At the time, Google waved away the objections like Obi-Wan waving his droids through a storm trooper checkpoint: Android is part of the solution to Java fragmentation, not the problem -- Sun should love Google for replacing Java with its own far-reaching standard. Sun never made any official stink about it again, even though Google's reaction smelled like the insides of a dead tauntaun.

Until now, that is. Sun parent Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL) is now suing Google for patent infringement, claiming that: "In developing Android, Google knowingly, directly and repeatedly infringed Oracle's Java-related intellectual property." Oracle is looking for treble damages ("triple" in legalese, not the other half of "treble and bass") and wants to stop Google from shipping, selling, or promoting Android. That would certainly hurt Google.

This lawsuit was a bit of a shock to me, because I assumed that Google had made the problem go away by some sort of proactive action. But the legal complaint states in no uncertain terms that Google lacks the licenses required to use Java in this way.

This case echoes of a long-running action Sun carried out against Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) last decade over strikingly similar problems. Mr. Softy ended up paying $1 billion in damages for that one, and Oracle would probably love a settlement of that scale again.

I'm guessing here, but it would make sense for Google to settle this affair quickly and quietly -- pay up a license fee for the right to use and modify the Java platform and then go on with business as usual. There is an alternative development framework available for Android programmers, based on the much more bare-metal C/C++ programming language. Going to that model exclusively would require hordes of Android developers to learn a new and arguably more difficult language. That would be a serious roadblock in the race to outgrow the Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) iPhone store in application quantity.

Java has been released under an open-source license after all -- excluding the mobile version. Oracle's stock is falling harder than Google's today. Are investors worried that Oracle alienates its own worldwide developer base here by raising thorny and nearly forgotten licensing issues? Discuss in the comments box below.

Legal Information. © 1995-2008 The Motley Fool. All rights reserve


What Goes Around Comes Around to Google (AAPL, GOOG, MSFT, ORCL)

_______________________________________
Check it out on The MasterTech Blog

Subscribe to The MasterTech's Feeds

Add This